Labels:book | bulletin board | reckoner | sky OCR: directly on point which Hancock does you cite 713 F.2d 254 {7th Cir. 1983} Chicago Board"} In Chicago Board. Connecticut General': argument. identical to Hancock's here, vas dismissed 75 baseless. The court reasonedf That ERISA does not relieve insurance companies of the onus of state regu ilation does not mean that Congress tended ERISA not to apply to irsurance cornpanies. Had that been Congres' intent We ATE sut that ERISA would have directly stated that it was preempted by state in- surance laws. Congress ciearly interded insurance companies he sunject to itmp regulation, at lear long federal and state regulations do not conflict td. at 260 (emphasis added); see also N.A.A.C. American Family Mut. Co. 978 F2d 287 295 {7th Ci 19921. The only relevant case upon which Hancock relies i in f ...
(.png)
